|
10/6/05
So if you think John Roberts is a lightweight who came out of
nowhere, how do you like Harriet Miers? Not only does she have
no experience as a judge, she doesn’t even have any
significant experience in court, but the guy who thinks he’s
President told us with a straight face that she’s the best
nominee he could find. Maybe that’s true. Maybe there’s not
a serious jurist in the country who wants to take the best
judicial job in the country, if it comes at the invitation of
Gee Dub.
Actually, this is not the first time a President ever
appointed his personal lawyer to the high court. LBJ sent his
personal mouthpiece, Abe Fortas, up to the big bench, but he at
least had a little courtroom and judicial experience. Fortas
ended up resigning from the court behind a financial scandal
which was small by today’s standards. I read one piece which
said that Harry Truman appointed four poker playing companions
to the Court and, "They were a mediocre lot." Every
president seems to view Supreme Court appointments a little
differently.
Bush claims, out of one side of his mouth, that there are no
litmus tests, but at the same time he tells us that he’s
looking for people who reflect his judicial philosophy. It’s a
little hard to imagine that Dub has a "judicial
philosophy," but if Miers has one, few people would know
it, since she has no judicial record by which anyone could
measure it. We do know that she belongs to one of those
born-again, evangelical Protestant churches which clearly turns
her red in the big litmus test on abortion. Miers has been Dub’s
lawyer for about 20 years, but he told us, again with a straight
face, on Tuesday that he didn’t know her opinion on Roe vs.
Wade. If you believe that, I have some weapons of mass
destruction you might be interested in buying.
Curiously, the Democrats, the so-called liberals, haven’t
even come out of the gate on Miers and Dub already is fending
off the skepticism of his conservative constituency. Those folks
don’t think Miers and Roberts have ENOUGH right wing
credentials. In other words, those God-fearing, patriotic, born
again Protestants are deathly afraid one of these people might
actually vote in favor of something like free speech, gay
marriage or the right to abort a pregnancy.
* * *
I thought Dub’s press conference on Tuesday showed us a guy
who’s lost a lot of political swagger. The answers he gave and
even the questions he was asked showed that he’s not the horse
he once thought he was. Someone even had the hair to ask him,
"Are you still a conservative?" and if he’d been
sitting, he looked like he’d have fallen off his chair. In
discussing the failure of his proposals for Social Security
reform, he didn’t talk about staying the course, he said,
"I did make some progress convincing the people there is a
problem." Some of the conspiracy mongers used to blow smoke
about how the Bush gang was set to concoct one or more crises as
an excuse to retain power beyond the two-term limit. What we saw
on Tuesday was a guy who’s winding down. His financial goals
are close to being accomplished. He’s no longer obligated to
tell anyone about any more noble goals. When Bush first stepped
into the national spotlight, he couldn’t lie without that
little smirk. He’s lost the smirk, but he still can lie. He no
longer has any need, however, to lie that he’s committed to
peace in the world.
* * *
I wonder if Tom Delay’s little problem with a grand jury in
Texas contributes to the Bushwhacker’s more humble demeanor.
Even the pious born-again, Bill Frist, whom many regard as Dub’s
anointed successor, has a little financial ethics problem
looming in his future, and then there’s the matter of a couple
of influential people in the Bush administration being up to
their eyeballs in what the press has begun to call "Plamegate."
Dick Cheney’s chief of staff, Scooter Libby, finally
admitted that he was the source whose anonymity kept New York
Times reporter Judith Miller in jail since July 6th, and she got
out last Friday. I have to admit I don’t understand this
story. First of all, Miller never published anything that could
be attributed to Libby, but she’s said to have a long-term
relationship with him as a news source. If so, why would he let
her sit in jail for nearly three months over a story she never
wrote? Libby says his staff gave her the go-ahead from the
beginning to testify about their conversations, but she was
holding out for his personal contact which she didn’t receive
for 85 days. I’m not sure Miller is standing entirely on
journalistic ethics, here, but I’m guessing she knows
something that would have been more damaging to the Bush gang
three months ago than it will be now.
* * *
I enjoyed the way the GV Union played the Tom Delay
story alongside our local congressman’s reaction to it. The
two greatest names in Congress, side by side: Do little and
delay. This is from a website called FOCUS. Eugene Robinson
asks, "What’s the difference between the Republican Party
then and now? Richard Nixon was the president who established
the Environmental Protection Agency. Tom Delay is the
congressman who called it a ‘latter-day Gestapo.’"
* * *
Great headline, top of the front page in last Saturday’s Union:
"Too much pot? Call the cops." I can think of several
different things that might mean, but nothing that occurred to
me was in the story which followed. The story was that if you’re
growing weed with a medical recommendation, and you’re not
sure how much you’re allowed to grow, you should call the cops
and let them take any excess off your hands. What it didn’t
say was that they might also take you off to Wayne’s World.
* * *
Person-on-the-street type column in last Sunday’s Chronicle–the
question was "Can you depend on President Bush in a
crisis?" Best answer: "If we were lost with him in the
woods, I think he’d be the first one we’d have to eat." |