|
Oct 17 commentary
Last week I reported on our slide into fascism. Today we have
another example: article By Wendy M. Grossman in " The
Register entitled US
demands air passengers ask its permission to fly" -- -
Under new
rules proposed by the Transport Security Administration (TSA)
(pdf), all airline passengers would need advance permission
before flying into, through, or over the United States
regardless of citizenship or the airline's national origin.
Currently, the Advanced Passenger Information System, operated
by the Customs and Border Patrol, requires airlines to forward a
list of passenger information no later than 15 minutes before
flights from the US take off (international flights bound for
the US have until 15 minutes after take-off). Planes are
diverted if a passenger on board is on the no-fly list. The new
rules mean this information must be submitted 72 hours before
departure. Only those given clearance will get a boarding pass.
The TSA estimates that 90 to 93 per cent of all travel
reservations are final by then. The proposed rules require the
following information for each passenger: full name, sex, date
of birth, and redress number (assigned to passengers who use the
Travel Redress Inquiry Program because they have been mistakenly
placed on the no-fly list), and known traveller number (once
there is a programme in place for registering known travellers
whose backgrounds have been checked). Non-travellers entering
secure areas, such as parents escorting children, will also need
clearance. The TSA held a public hearing in Washington DC on 20
September, which heard comments from both privacy advocates and
airline industry representatives from Qantas, the Regional
Airline Association,
IATA,
and the American
Society of Travel Agents.
The privacy advocates came from the American
Civil Liberties Union
and the Identity
Project. All were
negative. Ok, whats this all mean? If this rule is approved and
im not sure just who grants this approval, you will need the
govts permission to fly. Your papers please. It aint a
rule yet, but the fascists in control of our nation are trying.
Next item: well, our heroes the congressional dems caved in
again. They had been threatening to hold up the slam duck
nomination of judge Michael somebody or other until the white
house released a stack full of documents pertaining to the
firing of the federal prosecutors for not following our great
leaders wishes. That would have resulted in a very public
standoff and just might have actually forced the bush
administration to follow the law but the dems couldn’t keep
their resolve. Turns out the threat, like all the other threats
by the democratic leadership, were mere sound bites. The white
house, read dick cheney, told em to pound sand, and sure enuff,
they caved. So the dems, who had their chance to force the while
house into releasing some documents revealing how they really
operate blew it once again. Leadership by the gutless.
Next item: ok kids. You want a classic definition of
hypocrisy? We now give you sec of state condoleeza rice. this
story is so cockeyed that I had to pinch myself to see if I was
dreaming. Unfortunately I wasn’t. its real. Secretary of State
condi rice was visiting Moscow and meeting with Russian
activists. While there she managed to raise hypocrisy to a new
art form. Believe it or not our dear sec of state fears that The
Russian government under Vladimir Putin has amassed so much
central authority that the power-grab may undermine Moscow's
commitment to democracy. here is a quote from our sec of states
own lips: "In any country, if you don't have countervailing
institutions, the power of any one president is problematic for
democratic development," Rice told reporters after meeting
with human-rights activists. "I think there is too much
concentration of power in the Kremlin. I have told the Russians
that. Everybody has doubts about the full independence of the
judiciary. There are clearly questions about the independence of
the electronic media and there are, I think, questions about the
strength of the Duma," said Rice, referring to the Russian
parliament. Condi baby. Have you checked out your own govt
lately? Is this chutzpah or what? this statement would be
amusing if condi were a housewife. The fact that she is our sec
of state makes her statements frightening beyond comprehension.
Next item : speaking of Vladimir putin: the neo cons running
the us govt in our name may have finally met an insurmountable
obstacle to their plans to bomb or invade iran. It aint the us
congress, and it aint us citizen activists. Its Vladimir putin,
leader of Russia, and one of the few people on earth the neo
cons must respect. He recently visited iran and while there
pledged to oppose any countries waging war on iran by all
means at his disposal. Those are strong words. It looks like the
sides are lining up on this issue eirily remininscent of the
time just before world war I erupted. The lineup is interesting.
On one side are the united states neocon, and Israel, and on the
other side are the American people, and the rest of the world,
including russia. The neocons don’t seem to care what the
American people want, The rest of the world doesn’t really
count for much, but Russia does. Even the neocons are probably
not ready to go to war with Russia. Ok, peace activists, how
many of you ever imagined you would be thanking the pres of
Russia for keeping us out of a war? How times change.
Next item: ....Bravenewfilms.org sponsored a contest to help
fox news with their new business news show by suggesting
potential storie lines. The winning suggestion was: Should
Returns gained from Political Bribes be Taxed as Income or
Dividends? It goes without saying that the corporation giving
the bribe will write it off as a normal business expense. I
offer a further dynamite suggestion: should the congresscritters
who take the bribes declare them as income, donations to their
campaign fund, gifts from god, and then write off the taxes paid
as a normal business expense? It is beginning to appear that
bribing congresscritters is a normal business practice, so why
shouldn’t briber and bribee both be able to write em off as
the expenses of doing business with our esteemed congress? How
else would anything get done?
Next item: burning man takes on blm. Edit this:A group of
burner attorneys are mounting a grassroots project to challenge
BLM citations that may have been issued WITHOUT probable
cause and/or where consent to search was NOT freely given. If
you or anyone you know was issued a federal citation from a BLM
Officer or BLM Ranger at Burning Man 2007 and you are interested
in contesting the citation then read on. (Please note this only
applies to BLM citations; not Pershing County arrests or
citations for state law violations.)
it seems that The same story has been recounted from numerous
participants, and if
the reports are true, then there seems to be a pattern. It
goes something like this. Participant is stopped by BLM Rangers
for no reason in particular, or for a very minor reason, and is
then told that they have no choice but to allow a search.
However, there may have been violations of the Fourth Amendment
in these types of interaction. The problem is that in order to
fight the fine, the participant would need to show up at a
hearing in Reno, and possibly return later for a
trial. Since the cost of most BLM citations is $525 or less,
it makes it easier to just pay the fine than to take days off
work to travel to Reno. Also, $525 is cheaper than hiring an
attorney. Accordingly, most participants simply pay the fine as
the lesser of two evils.
Next item: we have some interesting news on the income tax
front. This is from truthattack.org. It seems that some guy had
the nerve to take the constitution seriously and paid his
employees in real money instead of federal reserve notes. The
govt of course sued and what is germane is that the govt lost in
court.
NEVADA JURY HANDS GOVERNMENT ITS HEAD score: US citizens 189—U.S.
& IRS 0 & TENTH CIRCUIT SAYS PRA IS A DEFENSE FOR
FAILURE TO
FILE
LAS VEGAS, NV—Yep, we keep marching along on the legal
front. In Las Vegas after a four month trial, millions of
tax dollars and taken dollars spent, the jury has refused to
give the government even one single guilty verdict out of 189
accusations. The Kahre case resulted in many not guilty
verdicts, such as indicting Mr. Kahre’s mother for shuttling
paperwork between offices, and the jury was hung on all the
rest.
This is a major victory in what is an extremely important case,
because the government’s position relied on the jury believing
that gold and silver coin minted by the U. S. Treasury IS NOT
money while FRNs worth nothing and printed by the Fed ARE
money. Mr. Kahre was paying his employees with silver and
gold coin, which meant that a week’s pay that would normally
amount to 450 FRNs would turn out to be $40 in silver or gold
coin. If an employee’s pay is $40 a week there is no
withholding and if his annual "income" is a little
over $2,000, he owes no tax return or taxes.
Beautiful!! The IRS and the Fed, foist on
their own petard!! This case combines the tax issue and
the phony money issue, which is appropriate, since it is no
coincidence that the income tax and the Fed were created at the
same time. Congratulations and thanks go out to the
defense team and, most of all, Mr. Kahre and all the others who
put all on the line to stand up for the rule of law.
DENVER, CO—And there’s more good news.
In a decision just handed down by the Tenth Circuit in
U.S. v. Chisum the court held that ". . . the PRA protects
a person . . . for failing to file information. It does
not protect one who files information which is
false." The entire opinion is posted under
"Downloads" on the TA web site for those who want to
read it. Although not a direct holding, since the case did not
involve a failure to file, this declaration by the court is in
direct conflict with the Ninth Circuit, setting up an appeal of
this issue to the Supreme Court. They aren’t going to
like that. Expect a severely chastised and remorseful
Tenth to order a rehearing on its own motion to
"clarify" its opinion. For more info about this
issue, pull up and play Tom Cryer’s October 6, ’07,
interview with Lindsey Springer in the archives at www.republicbroadcasting.org.
|