"For links to the articles I read on the air, guest websites, archived shows, my commentaries, a listener's discussion forum, and the text of Mark Stanneart’s latest commentary, visit: www.rabblerousing.org."

Well, oj simpson is back in the news with a 3 ½ million book deal. and TV special about how he WOULD have killed his wife IF he DID kill his wife (and Ron Goldman). In case that seems too bizarre to be true, keep in mind that there has been a precedent. Recall serial killer ted bundy? While in prison awaiting eventual execution, but still maintaining his innocence, bundy was approached by an author who got him to reveal intimate details of his murderous spree by creating the façade of employing bundy’s expertise to quote "get into the mind of the serial killer" and speculate on what might have transpired. Using this obvious ruse, bundy revealed many details of his crimes, while not legally incriminating himself, which hopefully provided something of value to his victims relatives, as well as to anyone trying to figure out the mind of a sexual predator and serial killer. So this idea of an unrepentant killer speculating over the crime he denies committing is not a new one. Lets face it. We live in a very bizarre world, and this latest twist is simply one more example.

Next item: I found an interesting item in the weekly astrology forcast I read. The former KGB spy Alexander Litvinenko, was poisoned with JUST enough radioactive polonium-210 to make him SUFFER a long and painful death before it killed him. Not too much to kill him immediately but more than could be cured. The slow, painful poisoning sends a crystal clear, Saturn/Pluto kind of message to all critics of the abuse of power, authority, structures, earth, corporations and governments. Im sure listeners have heard of this news, but did you read his death bed statement? Its really quite poetic, In it, Litvinenko accused Vladimir Putin, the leader of Russia, ashis killer"… as I lie here I can distinctly hear the beating of wings of the angel of death. I may be able to give him the slip but I have to say my legs do not run as fast as I would like. I think, therefore, that this may be the time to say one or two things to the person responsible for my present condition. You may succeed in silencing me but that silence comes at a price. You have shown yourself to be as barbaric and ruthless as your most hostile critics have claimed. You have shown yourself to have no respect for life, liberty or any civilized value. You have shown yourself to be unworthy of your office, to be unworthy of the trust of civilized men and women. You may succeed in silencing one man but the howl of protest from around the world will reverberate, Mr. Putin, in your ears for the rest of your life. May God forgive you for what you have done, not only to me but to beloved Russia and its people."

Next item: Im not a lawyer, and even if I was, that does not mean I would be conversant on this arcane aspect of the law, so I cant speak to its validity, but I have run across this principle before, of our nation secretly being under admirality law, and one piece of evidence cited was the gold border around the us flag prominent in every court. This gold bordered flag is purported to be an admiralty flag, identifying the court as being under admiralty law. a listener sent in the following article, from a web posting. From: Big Al Subject: Habeas is a PRIVILEGE

Contrary to what everyone believes, the Habeas Corpus is not a right. It is a privilege. It is stated well in the National Security Law, by Little and Brown & Co. ISBN 0-316-09228-2. It's $104 bucks from Amazon. A friend, James Montgomery obtained this book from a lawyer he met. The lawyer acknowledges we are under admiralty law and are solidly under War Powers since 1863. I skimmed the book when James was visiting and that caught my eye. The info on Whiting and the War powers is laced throughout this book . The lawyer told James that there is no definition in law on just what constitutes Martial Law. It is up to those in power to define it this book is loaded with federalist papers writings and the authors, all professors of law, admit that the powers of the President in war is not discussed at all. Geo Washington took advantage of this lack of direction in 1791 and adopted his own power to go against the constitution and institute the First Bank under war powers. A web poster calling himself the Informer stated this in his articles on atgpress on war powers. James said this lawyer was well versed in this aspect of law and gave James this book, stating that he needed to read this as it is telling how the present government operates today. So I suggest you locate this book and read for yourself how we are being raped, pillaged and plundered by the very government you believe is to protect us for it seems no one believes what James and I and the Informer and a few others write. You will see how, through the inception of this country, we, the common man and woman have been played big time and explains what we researchers have said--- You will not win in their private courts when going against them,. This explains and answers a lot of questions and is all in one book and it is about 763 pages. It is written so that you do not go to sleep reading it. So you might want to spread this around to people I can't reach in other groups. Signed big al